<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candidate Scorecard: Gay Rights</title>
	<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/</link>
	<description>Helping Mankind Overcome Religion</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77197</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77197</guid>
		<description>i love your blog more and more every day.... !  fantastic.... keep it uP!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>i love your blog more and more every day&#8230;. !  fantastic&#8230;. keep it uP!!!!!!!!
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lambert</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77194</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone vote for a Republican? Wasn't it not to long ago that blacks and whites were not allow to marry outside their race? Why is Canada so far ahead of the good ol' USA as far as health care and human rights issues? Maybe it is because they already know how to treat everyone in their country as equals. Americans really need to use the bible, they so love, and do what it says. The "love thy neighbor" thing....i think he meant it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Why would anyone vote for a Republican? Wasn&#8217;t it not to long ago that blacks and whites were not allow to marry outside their race? Why is Canada so far ahead of the good ol&#8217; USA as far as health care and human rights issues? Maybe it is because they already know how to treat everyone in their country as equals. Americans really need to use the bible, they so love, and do what it says. The &#8220;love thy neighbor&#8221; thing&#8230;.i think he meant it!!!
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77190</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77190</guid>
		<description>Altough Clinton and Obama's stances seem the most "touching" and "heartfelt", Ron Paul's seems to make the most sense in terms of using the U.S. Constitution as a template. He may have his personal beliefs about marriage, but he definitely feels that the federal government has no business in defining marriage, and that it should be left up to the states to decide. If a working, tax-paying homosexual couple resides in a state in which they cannot legally get married, they have the choice to move to another state that allows it. This costs their former state lost revenues (generated by their tax dollars), and the new state now aquires two additional working citizens. If the trend keeps up, the former state may in fact recognize homosexual marriage in order to keep as many tax-payers as possible. Think of individual states as seperate companies competiting for your tax dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Altough Clinton and Obama&#8217;s stances seem the most &#8220;touching&#8221; and &#8220;heartfelt&#8221;, Ron Paul&#8217;s seems to make the most sense in terms of using the U.S. Constitution as a template. He may have his personal beliefs about marriage, but he definitely feels that the federal government has no business in defining marriage, and that it should be left up to the states to decide. If a working, tax-paying homosexual couple resides in a state in which they cannot legally get married, they have the choice to move to another state that allows it. This costs their former state lost revenues (generated by their tax dollars), and the new state now aquires two additional working citizens. If the trend keeps up, the former state may in fact recognize homosexual marriage in order to keep as many tax-payers as possible. Think of individual states as seperate companies competiting for your tax dollars.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Giuliani &#187; Candidate Scorecard: Gay Rights</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77177</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Giuliani &#187; Candidate Scorecard: Gay Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77177</guid>
		<description>[...] Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In &#124; Member Posts wrote an interesting post today on Candidate Scorecard: Gay RightsHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt…and then there were 6. My job got a bit easier after Florida as John Edwards and Rudy Giuliani both dropped out of the race, so their positions no&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>[&#8230;] Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Member Posts wrote an interesting post today on Candidate Scorecard: Gay RightsHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt…and then there were 6. My job got a bit easier after Florida as John Edwards and Rudy Giuliani both dropped out of the race, so their positions no&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77176</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2008/02/01/candidate-scorecard-gay-rights/#comment-77176</guid>
		<description>Way to pander to bigots McCain. Why is it that Republicans seem to be ignorant of history? Although the democrats civil union, not marriage approach seems ... condesending, I think it is only a sugar coating to placate people before they push for the real deal- full equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Way to pander to bigots McCain. Why is it that Republicans seem to be ignorant of history? Although the democrats civil union, not marriage approach seems &#8230; condesending, I think it is only a sugar coating to placate people before they push for the real deal- full equality.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
