<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calendar of Credulity - Part II: Holi</title>
	<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/</link>
	<description>Helping Mankind Overcome Religion</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: social scientist</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4876</link>
		<dc:creator>social scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-4868" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;roya on April 5, 2006 at 6:22 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

SS, "You are a lovable rogue Roya"

 :cry: I have a heart you know! :(&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry Roya,
                  I am being too Australian to you, that was meant as an endearing comment, a robust Australian would have taken that as an affectionate compliment. I meant it that way Roya sorry it is the Aussie way of saying you are ok even when we might not agree on everything seems to be too teasing to mean that.
Fay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<blockquote><a href="#comment-4868" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>roya on April 5, 2006 at 6:22 am said:</em></a></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>SS, &#8220;You are a lovable rogue Roya&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p> <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif' alt=':cry:' class='wp-smiley' /> I have a heart you know! <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Sorry Roya,<br />
                  I am being too Australian to you, that was meant as an endearing comment, a robust Australian would have taken that as an affectionate compliment. I meant it that way Roya sorry it is the Aussie way of saying you are ok even when we might not agree on everything seems to be too teasing to mean that.<br />
Fay
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UberKuh</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>UberKuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-4867" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;social scientist on April 5, 2006 at 3:00 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Arg, I clicked on the link to see the new black hole research and the link failed and I didn't get to see it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, that sounds like a black hole! If you like, contact me at my website and I'll email it over to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<blockquote><a href="#comment-4867" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>social scientist on April 5, 2006 at 3:00 am said:</em></a></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Arg, I clicked on the link to see the new black hole research and the link failed and I didn&#8217;t get to see it.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Hey, that sounds like a black hole! If you like, contact me at my website and I&#8217;ll email it over to you.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roya</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>roya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>SS, "You are a lovable rogue Roya"

 :cry: I have a heart you know! :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>SS, &#8220;You are a lovable rogue Roya&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p> <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif' alt=':cry:' class='wp-smiley' /> I have a heart you know! <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social scientist</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>social scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-4860" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;UberKuh on April 4, 2006 at 3:39 pm said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Kay, I don't know if you're interested, but &lt;a href="http://ej.iop.org/links/q95/wxcPiGZ4JeSJiUoSeLk70w/njp5_1_199.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is a 2005 article on the state of black hole research. Some of this stuff is pretty cool. For those who wonder what the hell that circle with a dot in the center stands for, it stands for one solar mass (i.e., mass of the Sun).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Arg, I clicked on the link to see the new black hole research and the link failed and I didn't get to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<blockquote><a href="#comment-4860" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>UberKuh on April 4, 2006 at 3:39 pm said:</em></a></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Kay, I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re interested, but <a href="http://ej.iop.org/links/q95/wxcPiGZ4JeSJiUoSeLk70w/njp5_1_199.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a> is a 2005 article on the state of black hole research. Some of this stuff is pretty cool. For those who wonder what the hell that circle with a dot in the center stands for, it stands for one solar mass (i.e., mass of the Sun).</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Arg, I clicked on the link to see the new black hole research and the link failed and I didn&#8217;t get to see it.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social scientist</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>social scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 07:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2006/03/11/calendar-of-credulity-part-ii-holi/#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-4856" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;roya on April 4, 2006 at 10:11 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Lol. SS, you did what I do almost all the time. That is to quote people I haven't read but have found those quotes in other books. You also forgot to mention them in your reference. ;)

"I have only used the evidence and quotes from the books and magazines of non-Christian pro-evolution theory scientists."

No you didn't, as I explaind. You also showed this here.

"I still have a truck load of information from molecular biologists that disproves the theory of the evolution of life that I can whip out if the subject goes that way further."
 :lol:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are a lovable rogue Roya,
                                            I have made all the references available in the text or in the reference list and I have read the books of the evolutionists scientists that I quoted from cover to cover. The only two quotes I used that were not from evolutionists scientists in the above essay were not people giving a scientific opinion (even though one was a honours graduate scientist), they were simply a source of undeniable evidence that supports my assertions about the age of the universe and inaccuracy of carbon dating methods in relation to the plausability of evolution's necessary millions of years doctrinal requirement (e.g. the clock rock, petrified wooden pillings under the temple). When I said I have truck loads of information in my filing cabinet I did not mean that the above essay was incomplete in giving you every source I used to complete that essay. What I meant was I research every area for months for that essay but decided not to use the molecular science information for that essay as I was limited to 2000 words and could not develop the point on every area according to the title I had to give for the major essay (the last one worth 50% of my marks). So I kept the research from non-scientists that I did not use in that essay in my filing cabinet, as I do with all study notes. It is hard to believe but I did read more that a dozen large science books and countless science magazines from cover to cover to get the information for my essay, so I did gain a reasonable knowledge of science in that research even though I have not done academic study in science.  :mrgreen: 
Fay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<blockquote><a href="#comment-4856" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>roya on April 4, 2006 at 10:11 am said:</em></a></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Lol. SS, you did what I do almost all the time. That is to quote people I haven&#8217;t read but have found those quotes in other books. You also forgot to mention them in your reference. <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>&#8220;I have only used the evidence and quotes from the books and magazines of non-Christian pro-evolution theory scientists.&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>No you didn&#8217;t, as I explaind. You also showed this here.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>&#8220;I still have a truck load of information from molecular biologists that disproves the theory of the evolution of life that I can whip out if the subject goes that way further.&#8221;<br />
 <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>You are a lovable rogue Roya,<br />
                                            I have made all the references available in the text or in the reference list and I have read the books of the evolutionists scientists that I quoted from cover to cover. The only two quotes I used that were not from evolutionists scientists in the above essay were not people giving a scientific opinion (even though one was a honours graduate scientist), they were simply a source of undeniable evidence that supports my assertions about the age of the universe and inaccuracy of carbon dating methods in relation to the plausability of evolution&#8217;s necessary millions of years doctrinal requirement (e.g. the clock rock, petrified wooden pillings under the temple). When I said I have truck loads of information in my filing cabinet I did not mean that the above essay was incomplete in giving you every source I used to complete that essay. What I meant was I research every area for months for that essay but decided not to use the molecular science information for that essay as I was limited to 2000 words and could not develop the point on every area according to the title I had to give for the major essay (the last one worth 50% of my marks). So I kept the research from non-scientists that I did not use in that essay in my filing cabinet, as I do with all study notes. It is hard to believe but I did read more that a dozen large science books and countless science magazines from cover to cover to get the information for my essay, so I did gain a reasonable knowledge of science in that research even though I have not done academic study in science.  <img src='http://evangelicalatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Fay
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
