“Oh, and by the way, a “fetus baby” is a contridiction, by definition. A “Baby” is born. A “fetus” is gestation”

Apparently, a fetus is so formed at 4 months of pregnancy they can actually save a premature baby at 4 months with help. Do you know what this means? It means “late term” abortions which many American abortion clinics do up to three month are actually ripping apart legs and arms and heads and organs of a real baby person (they find the bits) the fetal baby obviously feels the pain and fear of this destructive ripping apart but can’t say anything because they have no voice, no understanding of language, and cannot defend themselves from this horrible, brutal death sentence. Sorry I don’t agree with you, to me this can’t get any wrong, it is hurting and killing the most vulnerable and defenseless human being on this earth (a fetal baby) Yes A BABY AT 4 MONTHS FULLY FORMED ENOUGH FOR A HOSPITAL TO SAVED (HALF FORMED, FULLY FORMED WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? THE BABY SUFFER AND ITS RIGHTS ARE DENIED!)

roya on March 20, 2006 at 7:38 am said:

All these eggs that i lose one per cycle, should I give birth to all of them, SS?

You’re not making a monthly donation at the egg bank? You’re gonna burn, sister.

Is it killing a life not to fertilise an egg? If you think so then I am clearly in disagreement with you. But if you are irresponsible to take contraceptives and make a baby and then expect the baby to die for your lazyness then shame on you! If you are raped or going to die because of the pregnancy, ok I can accept you may not be able to go through with a pregnancy (though my friends mother who was raped did go through with the pregnancy and adoption for which my friend is grateful to be alive because of that decision).

On the positive side: the president (a woman, and, I believe, a nurse) of the local “Indian” tribe has threatened to open a clinic on their land. What a woman! If my computer wasn’t so screwed up, I’d be able to provide a link, but I can’t find it. I miss Excel!!!

Jean Meslier was a 17th century French priest who was also an atheist — indeed, his whose monumental diatribe against theism and superstition, “Mon Testament,” was the first coherent and unmbiguous atheist philosophical system. Much admired by
19th century American intellectuals — his work went through several editions back then — Meslier is virtually forgotten here today.
The brilliant youg French philosopher and prolific author Michel Onfray has written a must-read essay on Meslier in the current issue of the excellent quarterly review New Politics (Number 40). Onfray on Meslier is the first synthesis of
Meslier’s work by a world-class intellectual to appear since Voltaire’s. I
have written for New Politics an introduction to both Onfray’s important
essay and to Meslier. You can read my introduction — and find the link to
Onfray’s essay on Meslier in English — by clicking on:
http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2006/03/michel_onfray_o.html
I do hope you will help publicize Onfray’s important essay on Meslier.
Yours,
Doug Ireland

That translation of Onfray’s essay into English is brutal! It looks like it was done by a machine and is really hard to get through.

All these eggs that i lose one per cycle, should I give birth to all of them, SS?

You’re not making a monthly donation at the egg bank? You’re gonna burn, sister.