<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Night of Go(o)d TV</title>
	<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/</link>
	<description>Helping Mankind Overcome Religion</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>For a less-theistic take on The Great Pumpkin, check this out:

http://www.escapepod.info/2005/10/27/ep025-the-great-old-pumpkin/

The short story "The Great Old Pumpkin" (for those who haven't read it) mixes the GP story from Peanuts with a Lovecraftian/Cthulu-like viewpoint.  It's pretty funny.

(Also, my friend Toby Chappell was the composer of the soundtrack for this reading of it, so be sure to listen with headphones to get all the details.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>For a less-theistic take on The Great Pumpkin, check this out:</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p><a href="http://www.escapepod.info/2005/10/27/ep025-the-great-old-pumpkin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.escapepod.info/2005/10/27/ep025-the-great-old-pumpkin/</a></p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>The short story &#8220;The Great Old Pumpkin&#8221; (for those who haven&#8217;t read it) mixes the GP story from Peanuts with a Lovecraftian/Cthulu-like viewpoint.  It&#8217;s pretty funny.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>(Also, my friend Toby Chappell was the composer of the soundtrack for this reading of it, so be sure to listen with headphones to get all the details.)
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>Regarding Charles M. Schulz you're mistaking his characters views for the authors views. Just because a fictional character holds certain views does not mean, that the author/inventor of the character holds the same views.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Regarding Charles M. Schulz you&#8217;re mistaking his characters views for the authors views. Just because a fictional character holds certain views does not mean, that the author/inventor of the character holds the same views.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reluctant Atheist</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Reluctant Atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>I AM:
I dunno, maybe we're making small inroads here. 
For 1 thing, people are more willing to make fun of their alleged deity. There was once upon a time when doing that was blasphemy, &#38; punishable under the law (in England, for sure: probably still is, in some of the more backward states).
I saw a flick last year, called Time Changer (pre-atheist days), which was a mix of sci-fi &#38; apologetics, where a deeply religious man went forward in time (19th to 20th century). While it's not anyone's cup of tea (present company), it was actually semi-decent. Anyways, it illustrated the HUGE changes over the length of a century. 1 instance (it was kinda funny), where said hero went to a movie theater, &#38; came running out shouting "Stop the film! 1 of the characters took the lord's name in vain! Stop the film!" had me LOL. Another scene showed him talking to a science class, &#38; he began lecturing (the 20th century class) about how there is no science w/o the bible. He got a stern tonguelashing from the extant teacher. 
Long story short: yeah, the ubiquitous nonsense still remains, but it's nowhere near as invasive (that I know of, outside of maybe Indiana &#38; Oaklahoma) as it once was. 
If we keep chipping away at it, day-by-day, hopefully, it'll be regarded by our descendants as an old wives' tale. 
Hopefully. 
Fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>I AM:<br />
I dunno, maybe we&#8217;re making small inroads here.<br />
For 1 thing, people are more willing to make fun of their alleged deity. There was once upon a time when doing that was blasphemy, &amp; punishable under the law (in England, for sure: probably still is, in some of the more backward states).<br />
I saw a flick last year, called Time Changer (pre-atheist days), which was a mix of sci-fi &amp; apologetics, where a deeply religious man went forward in time (19th to 20th century). While it&#8217;s not anyone&#8217;s cup of tea (present company), it was actually semi-decent. Anyways, it illustrated the HUGE changes over the length of a century. 1 instance (it was kinda funny), where said hero went to a movie theater, &amp; came running out shouting &#8220;Stop the film! 1 of the characters took the lord&#8217;s name in vain! Stop the film!&#8221; had me LOL. Another scene showed him talking to a science class, &amp; he began lecturing (the 20th century class) about how there is no science w/o the bible. He got a stern tonguelashing from the extant teacher.<br />
Long story short: yeah, the ubiquitous nonsense still remains, but it&#8217;s nowhere near as invasive (that I know of, outside of maybe Indiana &amp; Oaklahoma) as it once was.<br />
If we keep chipping away at it, day-by-day, hopefully, it&#8217;ll be regarded by our descendants as an old wives&#8217; tale.<br />
Hopefully.<br />
Fingers crossed.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>Delta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>    When I was in high school our neighbor, who was my mom's friend, would often tell my mom and the other neighbor women folk that she talked to god and that god "told her to not get a job and stay at home all day" living off the money from her parents (she was divorced).  I'm pretty sure that my mom didn't believe that bullshit even though she's religious herself.  But when we discussed it she never would say "oh yeah, she's lying of course", she would leave this ambiguity in there as if she were afraid if she criticized this her whole worldview would collapse.  I simply told my mom that I didn't like her hanging out with friends that would outright lie to her everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>When I was in high school our neighbor, who was my mom&#8217;s friend, would often tell my mom and the other neighbor women folk that she talked to god and that god &#8220;told her to not get a job and stay at home all day&#8221; living off the money from her parents (she was divorced).  I&#8217;m pretty sure that my mom didn&#8217;t believe that bullshit even though she&#8217;s religious herself.  But when we discussed it she never would say &#8220;oh yeah, she&#8217;s lying of course&#8221;, she would leave this ambiguity in there as if she were afraid if she criticized this her whole worldview would collapse.  I simply told my mom that I didn&#8217;t like her hanging out with friends that would outright lie to her everyday.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sobex</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Sobex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/26/a-night-of-good-tv/#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>Er, that penultimate sentence above should read "sing about my country's relationship" etc.  Oops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Er, that penultimate sentence above should read &#8220;sing about my country&#8217;s relationship&#8221; etc.  Oops.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
