<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God Bless America</title>
	<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/</link>
	<description>Helping Mankind Overcome Religion</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reluctant Atheist</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Reluctant Atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>Chad: 
"That’s an interesting quote, but it’s kind of hard to tell what that means without context."
It was at a funeral, an offhand remark. Note that it doesn't speak of the Catholic, but was a more general commentary about Xtianity. 
I'd also read somewhere that AL converted at the battle of Gettysburg. Will look into it. 
I know you were speaking to Mike, but this 1: "It seems to me (through biographies and autobiographies) that the resolve of such leaders was direct result of their faith" would require some examples. 

Many of the Founding Fathers espoused Xtianity in public, but inveighed against it in their private letters. Railing against it in public (then as now) would've amounted to political suicide, as evidenced by Paine's publication of the Age of Reason, in which he was stigmatized in the very country he'd helped build. 
Madison, Jefferson, Adams, Paine, even Franklin (who rather liked the benign JC, but was unconvinced of his divinity). 
There was perhaps a knee-jerk response against the 'Divine Right' concept propounded by the Vatican (which helped give birth to the Deist movement). 

But track record is everything. It's how we measure employees, criminals, children, adults, &#38; yes, even saints. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Chad:<br />
&#8220;That’s an interesting quote, but it’s kind of hard to tell what that means without context.&#8221;<br />
It was at a funeral, an offhand remark. Note that it doesn&#8217;t speak of the Catholic, but was a more general commentary about Xtianity.<br />
I&#8217;d also read somewhere that AL converted at the battle of Gettysburg. Will look into it.<br />
I know you were speaking to Mike, but this 1: &#8220;It seems to me (through biographies and autobiographies) that the resolve of such leaders was direct result of their faith&#8221; would require some examples. </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Many of the Founding Fathers espoused Xtianity in public, but inveighed against it in their private letters. Railing against it in public (then as now) would&#8217;ve amounted to political suicide, as evidenced by Paine&#8217;s publication of the Age of Reason, in which he was stigmatized in the very country he&#8217;d helped build.<br />
Madison, Jefferson, Adams, Paine, even Franklin (who rather liked the benign JC, but was unconvinced of his divinity).<br />
There was perhaps a knee-jerk response against the &#8216;Divine Right&#8217; concept propounded by the Vatican (which helped give birth to the Deist movement). </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>But track record is everything. It&#8217;s how we measure employees, criminals, children, adults, &amp; yes, even saints.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>chad says,

"&lt;i&gt;Their theistic beliefs are intertwined all through the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.&lt;/i&gt;"

Wrong!

In the Declaration, yes. It refers to a "Creator" and to "Nature's God." But the Constitution is completely and absolutely 100% secular. No dieties nowhere. And the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

- Mike

p.s. no, the date doesn't count!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>chad says,</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>&#8220;<i>Their theistic beliefs are intertwined all through the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.</i>&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Wrong!</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>In the Declaration, yes. It refers to a &#8220;Creator&#8221; and to &#8220;Nature&#8217;s God.&#8221; But the Constitution is completely and absolutely 100% secular. No dieties nowhere. And the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>- Mike</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>p.s. no, the date doesn&#8217;t count!
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>vjack:
&lt;em&gt;Blind faith in dogma is a problem, whether it is religion, patriotism, etc. is secondary.&lt;/em&gt;

I agree.  I have faith in freedom because I have seen how the alternative works out.  It is not blind.

&lt;em&gt;Like religion, patriotism is maladaptive in that it leads to negative consequences.&lt;/em&gt;

I see where you're coming from.  I should clarify my position.  My loyalty is not to a person, an administration, a party or "The United States of America."  It is to the principles upon which this country was founded.  It is to the ideas of freedom and democracy.  Often, the greatest enemy of the country I love is the government thereof.  I don't give the actions taken by the American government a free pass.  That kind of patriotism is, in fact, maladaptive.  If we, as the body of the nation, see the head facing the wrong direction, it is our responsibility to turn it rather than follow it wherever it leads us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>vjack:<br />
<em>Blind faith in dogma is a problem, whether it is religion, patriotism, etc. is secondary.</em></p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>I agree.  I have faith in freedom because I have seen how the alternative works out.  It is not blind.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p><em>Like religion, patriotism is maladaptive in that it leads to negative consequences.</em></p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>I see where you&#8217;re coming from.  I should clarify my position.  My loyalty is not to a person, an administration, a party or &#8220;The United States of America.&#8221;  It is to the principles upon which this country was founded.  It is to the ideas of freedom and democracy.  Often, the greatest enemy of the country I love is the government thereof.  I don&#8217;t give the actions taken by the American government a free pass.  That kind of patriotism is, in fact, maladaptive.  If we, as the body of the nation, see the head facing the wrong direction, it is our responsibility to turn it rather than follow it wherever it leads us.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vjack</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>vjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>Take heat from "extremist members" of your audience? Interesting. Blind faith in dogma is a problem, whether it is religion, patriotism, etc. is secondary. Does this make me an anarchist? Like religion, patriotism is maladaptive in that it leads to negative consequences. 

As for the meat of your post, outstanding! You are correct to point out that we live in a Christian culture and that this provides the context in which we find ourselves - often without realizing it. In the same way, we live in a culture that is insidiously sexist, rascist, and homophobic. Like the "god bless America" banners, it is acceptable (and rarely noticed by the majority) to use "that's gay" in a negative sense. It is difficult to critique these problems without being able to step outside them, and yet it is difficult to remain outside all the time. Thus, your experience of finding yourself standing up for the Christian song without realizing what was happening is all too common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Take heat from &#8220;extremist members&#8221; of your audience? Interesting. Blind faith in dogma is a problem, whether it is religion, patriotism, etc. is secondary. Does this make me an anarchist? Like religion, patriotism is maladaptive in that it leads to negative consequences. </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>As for the meat of your post, outstanding! You are correct to point out that we live in a Christian culture and that this provides the context in which we find ourselves - often without realizing it. In the same way, we live in a culture that is insidiously sexist, rascist, and homophobic. Like the &#8220;god bless America&#8221; banners, it is acceptable (and rarely noticed by the majority) to use &#8220;that&#8217;s gay&#8221; in a negative sense. It is difficult to critique these problems without being able to step outside them, and yet it is difficult to remain outside all the time. Thus, your experience of finding yourself standing up for the Christian song without realizing what was happening is all too common.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/10/18/god-bless-america/#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>Franky, I agree that theocracies are scary and certainly am not arguing for that extreme.  But I did want to point out that the original context of the separation of church and state provision often seems to be forgotten.  While I know that the founding fathers were not all Christians and they did not want anything even remotely resembling a theocracy, it also seems pretty clear that they were not loathe to mention God either.  Their theistic beliefs are intertwined all through the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Reluctant Atheist, That's an interesting quote, but it's kind of hard to tell what that means without context.  I tend to think that was more of an indictment against the church at the time than it was some sort of statement against any belief in Christ.

Mike, It seems hard for me to believe such great historical figures were all great only in spite of their beliefs.  It seems to me (through biographies and autobiographies) that the resolve of such leaders was direct result of their faith, both in steadying their perserverence and conviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Franky, I agree that theocracies are scary and certainly am not arguing for that extreme.  But I did want to point out that the original context of the separation of church and state provision often seems to be forgotten.  While I know that the founding fathers were not all Christians and they did not want anything even remotely resembling a theocracy, it also seems pretty clear that they were not loathe to mention God either.  Their theistic beliefs are intertwined all through the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Reluctant Atheist, That&#8217;s an interesting quote, but it&#8217;s kind of hard to tell what that means without context.  I tend to think that was more of an indictment against the church at the time than it was some sort of statement against any belief in Christ.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Mike, It seems hard for me to believe such great historical figures were all great only in spite of their beliefs.  It seems to me (through biographies and autobiographies) that the resolve of such leaders was direct result of their faith, both in steadying their perserverence and conviction.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
