<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God is a Dick - Part II: Elijah and the Prophets of Baal</title>
	<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/</link>
	<description>Helping Mankind Overcome Religion</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dull Blade</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dull Blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Yes sir,  I can see that.  And I appreciate your wit and arguement.  I suppose that arguing that god isn't worthy of worship is like arguing that god prefers Moses to Mohamed.  You start with a benchmark of existance, either way you are giving human qualities to the phantom, which is part of what got us into this mess.  Don't get me wrong.  I'm loving your work, this series got me to hang around this site.  But even if you are successful in an arguement with a believer, that god is a dick, they will still walk away believing in god, dick that he is.

I guess my problem is, I see everything as an arguement with some Jesus-freak.  This arguement, while full of both vemon and giggles, leaves the loser with a new image of god.  Which is really no better than he started.

That being said.  I am Anxiously looking forward to the next installment!  I like to argue, I'm sure it's not an unheard of quality in the atheist blogosphere.  

Nothing but Love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Yes sir,  I can see that.  And I appreciate your wit and arguement.  I suppose that arguing that god isn&#8217;t worthy of worship is like arguing that god prefers Moses to Mohamed.  You start with a benchmark of existance, either way you are giving human qualities to the phantom, which is part of what got us into this mess.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong.  I&#8217;m loving your work, this series got me to hang around this site.  But even if you are successful in an arguement with a believer, that god is a dick, they will still walk away believing in god, dick that he is.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>I guess my problem is, I see everything as an arguement with some Jesus-freak.  This arguement, while full of both vemon and giggles, leaves the loser with a new image of god.  Which is really no better than he started.</p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>That being said.  I am Anxiously looking forward to the next installment!  I like to argue, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s not an unheard of quality in the atheist blogosphere.  </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Nothing but Love.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I'm not going after inconsistancies.  I'm going after god personally.  The point of this series is not that the bible is false.  The point is that even if it were true, Yahweh wouldn't be worthy of worship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>I&#8217;m not going after inconsistancies.  I&#8217;m going after god personally.  The point of this series is not that the bible is false.  The point is that even if it were true, Yahweh wouldn&#8217;t be worthy of worship.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dull Blade</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dull Blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>This is funny, but is it too easy?  Picking apart the inconsistancies of religion is no trouble at all.  Virgin birth, Resurrecton, transubstantation, and Bible double-speak is childsplay.  

Anyway, keep up the good work.  If we can't laugh at the Crazies...who can we laugh at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>This is funny, but is it too easy?  Picking apart the inconsistancies of religion is no trouble at all.  Virgin birth, Resurrecton, transubstantation, and Bible double-speak is childsplay.  </p>
</div>
<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>Anyway, keep up the good work.  If we can&#8217;t laugh at the Crazies&#8230;who can we laugh at?
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>You go man. What I never did in fact GET. Why if this god could set a pile of water saturated wood on fire, Why then was the same god unable to selectively take the lives of the baal priests? More slight of hand, more swindlers and just think if you don't agree with my interpretation then apparently I have the right , NO the duty to put you to death. You'd think people would finally get the simple fact that their god is, NOT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>You go man. What I never did in fact GET. Why if this god could set a pile of water saturated wood on fire, Why then was the same god unable to selectively take the lives of the baal priests? More slight of hand, more swindlers and just think if you don&#8217;t agree with my interpretation then apparently I have the right , NO the duty to put you to death. You&#8217;d think people would finally get the simple fact that their god is, NOT
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Watkins</title>
		<link>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 05:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evangelicalatheist.com/2005/07/03/god-is-a-dick-part-ii-elijah-and-the-prophets-of-baal/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>My mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div title='Click to quote this paragraph in your reply below' class='clickquote'>
<p>My mistake.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
